Wednesday, September 30, 2009

A Conversation Part 2

This could prove to be beneficial.


“There are many problems with chairs.

The first problem is a problem with all things. That is the definition. What is the definition of a chair? A chair doesn’t need to have a definition. In a lot of ways, it simply is. We never ask the question “is that a chair or not?” There are chairs with four legs, three legs, no legs, chairs with arms, without arms, with various numbers of arms. Does a chair have to have a back? What should it be made out of? Does it have to be made of various fabrics or can it be made out of something else entirely? What about that solid wooden block. Is it a chair? And this is just the tangible definition. In a metaphorical sense, everything can be a chair. Love, hate, anger, existentialism, democracy, large, green, coquettish, jump, ponder, feminize, wildly, is, very, are all chairs.

The second problem is very similar to the first problem. Why do chairs exist? What reason does the chair have for being here? How and should they be used? There are chairs which you can sit on and chairs which you can’t sit on. chairs which you can stand on, squat on, jump on, do a handstand on, fuck on, shit on, write poetry on, listen to music on, play video games on. And for all of these, there exist chairs which do precisely the opposite. It seems as though chairs exist for no reason and every reason.

The third problem concerns the history of chairs. When exactly were chairs invented? Are chairs something that need to be engineered or can they occur naturally. Was the first chair a rock? And then there’s the problem of how chairs have evolved over time. Of course the majority of chairs we have today bear very little resemblance to the chairs of old. Are there books on how this evolution occurred? Who would possibly write or read these books? The answer to this question is key. When I was in third grade, I knew a kid who knew a lot about hornets. I asked him how he knew so much and he replied with ‘I just go to the library. They have books on everything there.’ The first thing I thought of after hearing that was, ‘Well, do they have books on chairs?’ And how do the trends of chairs work? Is there some body that decides which chairs are in and which are out?

All things considered, your statement is still meaningless. The fact that you are in what you call a bed has no relevance in this situation. I am calling it a chair and the statement is consistent with the information provided above.”

“WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!”

“Chairs. Be careful here. It appears that there are several ways out of this.”

“What?”

“I must apologize. You are still overwhelmed and that is completely understandable. But you are a smart man and you have the reasoning skills to actually analyze this situation. So let’s just get rid of all this emotion clouding your judgment and let’s focus.

“…What are you?”

“You already have sufficient information about that. Come on. Think about it.”

“I…am trapped in this bed. You are keeping me here while my wife watches. But my wife is seeing something completely different from what I perceive is actually going on. But what I perceive is that you are some godlike being who is punishing us.”

“Precisely. Now where can you go from there?”

“You were set to kill me until I pointed out that what you were referring to as my favorite chair was actually a bed. Then you proceeded to try to justify your original statement by going on a long rant about chairs. And I’m still not sure what that exactly meant.”

“Go on.”

“…And…and I don’t know. Chairs? Something about chairs? I don’t understand. How is any of this related to chairs?”

“Chairs? No, you’ll have to do better than that. And you can.”

“This isn’t…about chairs? But, well, what the hell then! Wait a second. I get it! Chairs are irrelevant. You said it was my favorite chair. We can debate about the semantics of chair but you can’t change the fact that this is not my favorite bed or chair.”

“Well that’s a fairly clever solution to this little puzzle. But it has several problems. Favorite is an interesting term. It implies subjective thought but is that really the case? Are there not several factors that go into determining what your favorite anything is? That bed you’re in is making you feel more comfortable than you have ever felt. More comfortable than you ever thought possible. That is an undeniable fact.”

“Shut the fuck up. This is not my favorite goddamn chair. I’ve never even seen it before. I don’t give a fuck how comfortable it is if it means I’m stuck here forever talking to you.”

“This is not your favorite chair? Are you…sure?”

“Goddamnit what the fuck!”

“Come on, you had to know that was coming. You did such a good job of recapping the events, I thought for sure you would have figured it out. But I guess a lot of people have a tendency to underestimate me.”

“But…but…that still doesn’t make any sense. If you have all these powers, then why did you fuck up? You said I was going to die in 95 seconds. You even counted down. But I’m still here and I’m still talking to you.”

“I lied.”

“But….uhh……..hmm. There’s, uhh, still a problem with that right? I mean, why would you lie?”

“Now that is a truly interesting question. I lied about your demise and I’m still talking to you. Those are the facts.”

“Yes. I am still talking to you. And what we’re talking about is a way to get out of this. You gave me a chance to get out of this. You didn’t have to but you did. Just the fact that you gave me the chance means that I can get out of this. Otherwise this conversation is pointless. The answer to this puzzle is the puzzle itself. The puzzle wouldn’t exist if the solution would never be found. You knew this. This was all inevitable.”

“Hmm.”

“…”

“Precisely. Congratulations, you are free to go. Well, wait a second, there are of course some issues left.”

“What’s going to happen to my wife?”

“You don’t have a wife. The punishment was yours alone. But judging by your demeanor it seems you had pretty much figured that out. Any more questions?”

“Yeah, who the hell are you?”

“You already have suff-…I mean…I’m a pretty cool guy. Goodbye for now.”

“Wait, but, what am I supposed to do now?”

“I don’t really care.”

“Then what the hell was the point of all this? I still don’t understand anything…”

“Of course you don’t. That’s ok though. Just remember the pain.”

“..and who’s that behind you?”

“Who’s who?”

“Umm…that girl behind you who’s been there this whole time.”

“Oh, that’s Christina.”

“…Who’s that?”

“Who’s who?”

“Her…Christina…”

“Oh. Oh, she…she’s…my acquaintance. So, uhh, I think we’re done here. Ehh, looking back this whole thing was kind of cruel. I’m sorry. Just forget I did anything. And uhh, I think you’ll be fine, I think. So, uhh, goodbye I guess.”

“Wait, what?”

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Evolution of the Mind Part 1

Given:  The overwhelming majority of people in the universe (that we know of) believe in some sort of higher power that gives life a purpose.

Evolution is an interesting but simple process.  Organisms have genes.  Successful organisms multiply and produce offspring that contain their genes (specifically alleles).  These genes stay in the gene pool while the genes of the organisms who did not reproduce are eliminated from history.

CAUTION:  THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS DEVOID OF SCIENCE AND IS FIRMLY IN THE REALM OF PSEUDOSCIENCE AND/OR RETARDED ASS THOUGHTS

But we can try to explain the Given.  Let’s imagine early humans and the various assortment of genes they possessed.  Of course they possessed the genes that made them “human.”  These genes coded for the type of hair we have, how long our toes are, and gave us the ability to see.  Part of this set of genes went into developing the brain.  And if the brain is the mind, these genes influenced our early ancestors’ consciousnesses. 

Among this set of genes dealing with the mind has to be one for self-awareness.  We are sentient beings, fully aware of our existence, while other animals don’t seem to have this luxury. 

And this gene for self-awareness (though this is most likely a side effect of a variety of genes that control brain function) also gives us the ability to question our existence.  Why do we exist? 

The answer to this question can be binary.  There is a reason or there is no reason.  Let’s assume first that every early human possessed the gene (allele) that coded for “there is no reason for our existence.” 

If every one of these mind genes (alleles) carried such a code, people would never have developed a purpose for life and we would not be able to reach our Given.  It only takes one person with the “there is a reason” gene (allele) to pass that gene from gene pool to gene pool throughout history.  But our assumption invalidates this one person from ever existing.  One could make a case that a mutation arose in this gene sometime later on which caused it to switch to “there is a reason” in some random person.  Let’s not concern ourselves with this just yet because we might will not need it.

Of course the same is true for the reverse situation.  If everyone originally had the allele for “there is a reason,” then everyone would still feel that today.  Note that the Given does not make a statement as bold as this.  There are plenty of examples in today’s society that show everyone does not believe in a higher power and/or give life a purpose.  Of course, this can also be resolved with the mutation argument.

But I think the far more likely case is that both alleles for the gene existed in early humans.  While the Given may lead you to believe that the allele ratio of “there is a reason” to “there is no reason” is very high, this does not have to be the case.  Let’s assume that there were only a few people with the “there is a reason” allele while the vast majority of humans had the “there is no reason” allele.  Let’s also assume the traditional concept of dominant and recessive alleles is not so clear cut between these two alleles.  How do we get to the Given?

Well, so far, we’ve only been discussing the genotype.  The answer lies in the phenotype.  Early humans lived in very harsh times with very high mortality rates and cases of starvation.  The standard of living was incredibly poor compared to what it is now for even the poorest of classes.  The “there is no reason” allele had a direct consequence on phenotype.  Without any reason to live, displayers of this phenotype lost the will to live through such conditions and either gave up looking for food and shelter or committed suicide.  If there was nothing at all in the end, enduring the pain of life was not worth it.

Meanwhile, those who were blessed with the “there is a reason” allele fought through these harsh conditions.  Though the pain hurt them, they knew they would be rewarded for their perseverance.  While the there-is-no-reasoners slowly died off, the there-is-a-reasoners gathered together and constructed larger and larger societies, each fully obedient to the idea of a higher power which governed their daily actions.

Such was the start of the domination of organized religion.  It did not start through itself, it was merely a process of natural selection.  Just like everything in(volving) life.

But the there-is-no-reasoners did not completely die off.  As noted before, quite a few remain and they seem to be growing in number.  Perhaps some people decided that certain pleasures in life were worth the pain.  They quietly lived amongst the others, being patient as the standard of living became better and better and the pleasures slowly started to outweigh the pain more and more. 

They waited in the shadows, as society grew more secular. Until organized religion played no part in it.  Until secularization was complete.  Until there was no pain, only pleasure.  Until they had realized their Utopia. 

In other words, their Heaven on Earth.